Controls often “exist” – but whether they work under real conditions is unclear. This use case tests the effectiveness of your most important controls (e.g. segmentation, identity/MFA, hardening) in practice. Goal: within 60 days, less false sense of security and a clear improvement backlog.
If you’d like, we’ll show you typical patterns and control gaps in a short demo, together with our technology partner.
Policies say “should”, but reality is complex: exceptions, legacy, wrong assumptions. Teams believe a control works – until the attack shows it doesn’t. Without testing, much remains “gut feeling”.
We test selected controls along realistic attack paths and deliver evidence of where they hold and where they don’t. Then tuning follows, with verification.
Typical timeframe: 2–4 weeks for test + backlog + verification.
Select controls (max. 2–3 to start)
Define realistic scenarios
Test effectiveness (do they actually work?)
Prioritise tuning measures
Verification (before/after)
Does this become a huge project?
No – we deliberately start small (2–3 controls) and deliver a clear backlog.
Does it need many data sources?
Not necessarily. Proof is the priority, not data completeness.
What’s a “good” result?
A few clear improvements with noticeable impact – verifiable.
How does it fit into daily operations?
Through clear boundaries, short cycles and routing to owners.
Let’s check which controls actually work and where tuning has the greatest leverage.