Risk isn’t “many vulnerabilities”, but which path leads to the target. This use case reveals attack paths to your critical systems and derives where you break them most efficiently. Goal: within 60 days, the most important paths significantly defused – and new paths detected early.
If you’d like, we’ll walk through an example attack path together – in a short demo, with our technology partner.
Pentest reports often show individual findings, not the chain. Vulnerability lists show volume, not the path. Without focus on the attack path, it remains unclear whether controls (segmentation, MFA, hardening) actually stop a real chain – or just “look good”.
We identify critical targets, validate realistic paths to them and prioritise measures by leverage: which step breaks the path with minimal effort? Then we verify the closure – and keep an eye on new paths.
Typical timeframe: 2–4 weeks for an end-to-end cycle to start.
Define critical systems (brief, pragmatic)
Define realistic entry scenarios
Prove attack paths (entry → movement → target)
Prioritise stop points and assign owners
Verify fixes (path truly breaks)
Do you have to discuss “crown jewels” politically?
No – we start pragmatically with a few candidates and clear criteria.
Is this just network segmentation?
No – paths can involve identity, privileges, configurations and processes.
What’s a good result?
A few clear paths + a few measures with high leverage – and verified closure.
How does this run on an ongoing basis?
Continuously – ideally daily and from different zones/networks. That way you see not just “yesterday’s path” but detect new paths early and can act immediately.
Let’s reveal the most important attack paths to your critical systems and break them.